Small cities • 2016

Město Luhačovice

IČO 00284165

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ul. Dr. Veselého Luhačovice
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Jurkovičovy aleje Luhačovice
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Energetické úspory MŠ Luhačovice
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Úspory energie ZŠ Luhačovice 2, Školní 811
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2016
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sates Morava spol. s r.o.
4 26,542,400
Smo a.s.
2 8,032,060
Sanizo, spol. s r.o.
1 6,628,433
Stavby Zlín s.r.o. v likvidaci
1 3,331,247
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 2,686,024

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ul. Dr. Veselého Luhačovice
Dodatečné práce
1,002,781
Rekonstrukce ul. Dr. Veselého Luhačovice
Dodatečné práce
683,510
Rekonstrukce Jurkovičovy aleje Luhačovice
Dodatečné práce
480,629
Rekonstrukce ul. Dr. Veselého Luhačovice
Dodatečné práce
386,780

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (1 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 60% (6 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (2 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 10)