Government • 2015

Ústavní soud

IČO 48513687

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

36.
ranking
66%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Autocont Cz a.s.
3 8,655,221
Porsche Inter Auto Cz spol. s r.o.
2 7,862,424
S:lukas s.r.o.
1 2,450,000
Škoda Auto a.s.
3 2,165,596
E.on Energie, a.s.
1 976,500
Other suppliers 1 679,047

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 22,788,789
Unregulated purchases 67,981,733
Total 90,770,523

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rozšíření funkcionalit stávajících aplikací a částečná náhrada Elektronické podatelny v systému ECM
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
1,325,563

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

33%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (4 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 18% (2 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 18% (2 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 9% (1 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

19%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 25% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.02 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 9% (1 from 11)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.