Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Libereckého kraje

IČO 72050501

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

32%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Prima spol. s r.o.
9 46,796,302
Resa - sanace a rekonstrukce, spol. s r.o.
11 17,138,993
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
1 2,762,321
Ats-telcom Praha a.s.
1 2,189,140
Trade Fides, a.s.
2 2,104,701
Other suppliers 5 4,565,080

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 76,142,339
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 344,611,305
Total 420,753,644

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodatek č.7 ke Smlouvě o dílo (Pastýřská)
Not disclosed
- 1,438,910
Dodatek č. 3 ke Smlouvě o dílo (Pastýřská)
Not disclosed
- 1,290,208
Jednací řízení bez uveřejnění, Dodatek č. 1 ke Smlouvě o dílo
Not disclosed
- 507,126
Dodatek č.3 ke Smlouvě o dílo - prostory IOS
Not disclosed
- 303,941
Dodatek č.4 ke Smlouvě o dílo - prostory IOS
Not disclosed
- 200,391

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

17%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 67%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 47% (15 from 32)
Final or estimated price not published 41% (13 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 32)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 22% (7 from 32)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 32)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.28 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 32)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier bankruptcy 38% (12 from 32)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 28% (9 from 32)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.