State-owned enterprises • 2015

Čez, a. s.

IČO 45274649

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka a servis kogeneračních jednotek
Generátorová soustrojí se zážehovými motory
2
Ø3 in industry
6740 Zavedení důležitých měření do systému pohavarijního monitorování
Monitory radiace
1
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka dopravních pásů
Pásy pro dopravníky
6
Ø1 in industry
A860 - OBNOVA SKŘ NEBLOKOVÝCH PROVOZNÍCH SOUBORŮ ETE
Počítačové řídící systémy
5
Ø1 in industry
GO TG1 EKA - strojní část
Vodní turbíny
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Tedom a.s.
1 3,326,918,754
Škoda Js a.s.
6 951,400,000
KAUCHUK AD
0 350,000,000
Simco-trading Praha, s.r.o.
1 350,000,000
Osc, a.s.
4 113,450,000
Other suppliers 34 788,116,673

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

75%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 45% (19 from 42)
Division into lots 19% (8 from 42)
E-auction 0% (0 from 42)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 42)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

19%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 6,287,818,729
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 160,021,681,271
Total 166,309,500,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
6740 Zavedení důležitých měření do systému pohavarijního monitorování
Dodatečné práce
- 448,400,000
Vypracování analýz a zpracování dílů 4 a 15 Změny předprovozní bezpečnostní zprávy pro povolení záměny jaderného paliva v JE Dukovany za nové palivo (Gd-2M+)
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 49,000,000
Účast a servisní činnost pracovníků WEC při operacích spojených s provozem MSIO na HVB
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 38,000,000
Rozvoj palivového cyklu a zajištění provozních potřeb reaktorů ČEZ 2014 - 2017
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 37,500,000
D258 - Zapracování změn HVB do simulátoru
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 37,250,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.36

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (10 from 120)
Final or estimated price not published 88% (106 from 120)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 120)
Missing supplier ID 16% (19 from 120)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 120)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 120)
Missing call for tenders 2% (2 from 120)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 120)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 120)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

21%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 30% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 120)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (4 from 120)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 120)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (3 from 120)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (10 from 120)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.