State-owned enterprises • 2015

Řízení letového provozu České republiky, státní podnik (řlp Čr, s.p.)

IČO 49710371

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba TWR LKMT Ostrava - Mošnov
Výstavba administrativních budov
5
Ø4 in industry
Komplexní obnova a rozšíření radiokomunikací s obnovou VCS na regionálních letištích s migrací na VoIP
Zařízení pro řízení letového provozu
3
Ø1 in industry
EUROCAT 2000 PU – Batch 10
Dodávka programového vybavení
1
Ø1 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Letecká škola
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
18
Ø4 in industry
PRIMÁRNÍ RADAR - OSTRAVA A BRNO
Radar
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited - organizační složka
46 510,793,296
Cs Soft a.s.
31 295,994,972
Unknown name
0 136,351,095
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 127,287,584
Rohde  & Schwarz - Praha, s.r.o.
1 113,923,878
Other suppliers 183 1,100,329,421

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

83%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (10 from 30)
Nonprice competition 40% (12 from 30)
Lots 20% (6 from 30)
E-auction 13% (4 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

80%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,321,581,638
Unregulated purchases 1,278,072,862
Total 3,599,654,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

3%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
EUROCAT 2000 PU – Batch 10
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
93,204,000
Servisní SW a HW podpora pro systémy IDP, WALDO/ASTA2, Bypass, ESUP a METRAD
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
43,691,468
ESUP 4.7.2
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
39,096,300
ESUP 4.7.1
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
36,945,515
Portace IDP serverů
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
35,806,615

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 10%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.24

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 293)
Final or estimated price not published 58% (170 from 293)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 293)
Missing supplier ID 14% (40 from 293)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 293)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 293)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 293)
Missing call for tenders 5% (15 from 293)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

24%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 42% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.74 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 293)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (1 from 293)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (6 from 293)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 293)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 293)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (3 from 293)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (63 from 293)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.