Hospitals • 2015

Karlovarská krajská nemocnice a.s.

IČO 26365804

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 57%
Largest contracts
Lineární urychlovač pro nemocnici v Chebu
Lineární urychlovače
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce dialyzačního střediska Nemocnice Karlovy Vary
Rekonstrukce budov
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka a instalace CT systému pro nemocnici v Chebu
CT skener
Ø2 in industry
Přístrojové vybavení Pavilonu akutní medicíny a centrálního vstupu KKN a.s. - I.etapa
Zdravotnické přístroje
Ø2 in industry
Servisní péče zobrazovacího systému Philips Brilliance iCT SP 128-slice
Opravy a údržba rentgenových přístrojů
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Transkontakt-medical s.r.o.
3 108,126,497
Metrostav a.s.
2 30,340,419
L I N E T spol. s r.o.
4 24,044,488
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
3 23,243,300
Siemens, s.r.o.
3 18,439,835
Other suppliers 46 119,126,845

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 23% (5 from 22)
Nonprice competition 18% (4 from 22)
Lots 36% (8 from 22)
E-auction 0% (0 from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 332,520,073
Unregulated purchases 1,482,369,927
Total 1,814,890,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 78%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Servisní péče zobrazovacího systému Philips Brilliance iCT SP 128-slice
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
Provádění pozáručního servisu a údržby na přístroji zdravotnické techniky Angiolinka Allura Xper FD10 Floor
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 61)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (1 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing supplier ID 7% (4 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 61)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 61)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 72% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.68 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 61)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 61)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 61)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 61)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 61)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 61)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (9 from 61)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.