Government • 2015

Národní knihovna České republiky

IČO 00023221

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace Klementina - II. etapa
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rozvoj systému NDK
Poradenské služby v oblasti integrace programového vybavení
neuveden
Ø1 in industry
Úklidové služby pro objekty NK ČR
Úklidové služby
14
Ø8 in industry
Záchranný archeologický výzkum pro II. etapu Revitalizace Klementina
Archeologické služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Vybavení interiérů a mobiliář depozitářů NK v Hostivaři II.
Nábytek
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

12%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S u b t e r r a a.s.
1 478,500,750
Cgi It Czech Republic s.r.o.
2 34,758,880
H E R D U C A spol. s r.o.
1 16,250,000
Národní památkový ústav
1 13,852,750
Dřevozpracující výrobní družstvo
1 11,512,642
Other suppliers 11 42,138,973

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (4 from 6)
Nonprice competition 33% (2 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

90%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 604,244,994
Unregulated purchases 137,949,670
Total 742,194,664

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rozvoj systému NDK
Not disclosed
24,770,000
Optimalizace systému NDK
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody), Dodatečné práce
9,988,880
„Dočasné zajištění bezpečnostních služeb NK ČR“
Krajní naléhavost
3,382,429

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 18% (3 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

8%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 13% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.29 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (5 from 17)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.