Government • 2015

Národní institut dětí a mládeže Ministerstva školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy

IČO 00022217

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

22.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Astron studio Cz, a.s.
1 3,200,000
Agora Central Europe - společnost pro demokracii a kulturu
2 3,132,400
Omt group s.r.o.
2 2,794,800
Digitalcom, a.s.
1 2,357,859
Rada dětí a mládeže kraje Vysočina, z. s.
2 2,020,000
Other suppliers 38 24,208,401

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Inovativni 0% ( from 0)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 44,606,602
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 57,593,648
Total 102,200,250

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Tvorba a pilotáž vzdělávacích programů v oblasti průřezových témat - část č. 9, 11
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 1,670,000
Tvorba a pilotáž vzdělávacích programů v oblasti průřezových témat - část č. 9, 11
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 1,670,000
Služby elektronických komunikací
Krajní naléhavost
- 309,917

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

25%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 46)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 46)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 46)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 46)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 46)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 46)
Missing call for tenders 17% (8 from 46)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 46)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 46)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

43%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 46)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 2% (1 from 46)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 56%

Non-disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.