Government • 2015

Ministerstvo životního prostředí

IČO 00164801

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

22.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Integrátor bezpečnostních služeb v objektech Ministerstva životního prostředí a jeho resortních organizací
Bezpečnostní služby
2
Ø6 in industry
Implementace IS AVISme s komponentami EIS/ESS pro resort MŽP a zajištění technické podpory
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
2
Ø2 in industry
Informační kampaň k propagaci přínosů evropských fondů
Propagační služby
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup výpočetní techniky pro organizace resortu Ministerstva životního prostředí - MIGRACE DAT Z PŘEDCHOZÍHO PROFILU ZADAVATELE
Přenosné počítače
5
Ø3 in industry
Nákup kancelářských potřeb
Kancelářské potřeby
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Securitas Čr s.r.o.
1 249,990,374
Ibm Česká republika, spol. s r.o.
1 44,721,000
Young & Rubicam Praha s.r.o.
1 36,363,636
Citynet Systems s.r.o.
1 30,475,000
Erebos - podpovrchová výstavba, spol. s r.o.
4 30,000,000
Other suppliers 87 327,465,089

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 69% (20 from 29)
Nonprice competition 45% (13 from 29)
Lots 59% (17 from 29)
E-auction 3% (1 from 29)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,109,802,044
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,109,802,044

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 0.94

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

52%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (4 from 95)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (10 from 95)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 95)
Missing supplier ID 3% (3 from 95)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 95)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 95)
Call and award notices contradict each other 7% (7 from 95)
Missing call for tenders 4% (4 from 95)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

27%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 35% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.84 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 95)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 95)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (4 from 95)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 95)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 95)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (3 from 95)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 37% (35 from 95)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.