State-owned enterprises • 2015

Severočeská vodárenská společnost a.s.

IČO 49099469

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Intenzifikace úpravny vody Meziboří
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ÚV Bedřichov
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
5
Ø4 in industry
TP001019 Bílina, Všechlapy, rekonstrukce přivaděče
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
DC 025 015 Jiříkov, odkanalizování centra a rekonstrukce vodovodu
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
8
Ø5 in industry
Konzultační služby
Obchodní služby: právní, marketingové, poradenské služby, nábor zaměstnanců, tiskařské a bezpečnostní služby
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner, s.r.o.
4 351,463,504
Smp Cz, a.s.
2 79,238,908
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
2 33,942,728
Hst Hydrosystémy s.r.o.
3 24,074,030
Grant Thornton Advisory s.r.o.
1 20,000,000
Other suppliers 16 147,901,009

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (3 from 0)
Nonprice competition 37% (14 from 38)
Division into lots 34% (13 from 38)
E-auction 0% (0 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 712,339,564
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 3,414,118,936
Total 4,126,458,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.11

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

62%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 41)
Final or estimated price not published 32% (13 from 41)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 41)
Missing supplier ID 22% (9 from 41)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 41)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 41)
Missing call for tenders 5% (2 from 41)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 41)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 41)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 7% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.91 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

73%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 41)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 41)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 41)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 41)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 41)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (5 from 41)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (11 from 41)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.