Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Slaný

IČO 00234877

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

38%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STROJÍRNY A OPRAVNY MILENOV spol. s r.o.
1 88,800,601
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
2 19,398,932
Společnost Slaný / HERKUL a.s.
2 19,233,776
KONSIT a.s.
1 14,409,994
EVČ s.r.o.
1 10,994,290

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

48%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 188,613,757
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 639,740,695
Total 828,354,451

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ledové plochy - Zimní stadion ve Slaném – dodatečné stavební práce
Technical exclusivity
- 2,320,869
Revitalizace historického jádra města Slaný – Husova ulice – dodatečné stavební práce
Technical exclusivity
- 1,823,452

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

4%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders