Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Litovel

IČO 00299138

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

78.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

95%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 140,000,000
NOSTA, s.r.o.
3 35,864,725
IES RECYCLING, a.s.
2 21,331,902
ENWOX ENERGY s.r.o.
2 11,617,812
Jiří Novák
1 10,176,855
Other suppliers 9 25,840,937

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Division into lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

82%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 696,795,258
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 329,833,456
Total 1,026,628,713

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Realizace nápravných opatření na lokalitě Litovel - Nasobůrky
Additional works
- 18,290,775
Dodatečné stavební práce k zakázce Realizace nápravných opatření na lokalitě Litovel - Nasobůrky
Additional works
- 3,041,127
Litovel – napojení místních částí Rozvadovice, Unčovice, Březové, Víska a Chudobín na kanalizaci
Additional works
- 1,631,473
Rekonstrukce budov č.776 a 777 - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 920,361

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders