Government • 2015

Vězeňská služba České republiky

IČO 00212423

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Court found serious misconduct.

29.
ranking
67%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
GŘ OL - Eskortní autobusy
Vozidla pro přepravu vězňů
Not disclosed
Ø2 in industry
Příbram - snížení energetické náročnosti a využití OZE pro vytápění Věznice Příbram
Fasády
12
Ø5 in industry
GŘ OL – dodávky obuvi
Obuv se svrškem z usně
4
Ø2 in industry
GŘ OL - Velkokuchyňská technologie - Rámcová smlouva
Průmyslové kuchyňské zařízení
4
Ø6 in industry
GŘ OL - Užitková doprovodná vozidla
Motorová vozidla pro přepravu méně než 10 lidí
7
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Tezas servis a.s.
2 103,919,000
Vapes Ce s.r.o.
2 88,305,522
T R I O D O N , spol. s r.o.
1 47,313,000
P.v. Service, spol. s r.o.
1 42,660,000
Ros, a.s.
2 41,250,000
Other suppliers 43 116,334,394

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

28%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 440,920,406
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 5,313,618,122
Total 5,754,538,527

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rapotice - nová ubytovna pro odsouzené, JŘBU
Not disclosed
- 3,600,204
Plzeň - generální oprava kogenerační jednotky 2013-Jřbú
Not disclosed
- 2,509,485
GŘ OL – nákup oděvů (nabídka společnosti STS Praha – Hostivice s.r.o
Not disclosed
- 995,050
Odolov - hnědé uhlí - 2012
Not disclosed
- 728,333
Plzeň-rekonstrukce vstupního objektu do věznice-Jřbú
Not disclosed
- 435,956

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (5 from 51)
Final or estimated price not published 35% (18 from 51)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 51)
Missing supplier ID 8% (4 from 51)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 51)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 51)
Missing call for tenders 4% (2 from 51)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 51)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 51)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

83%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.16 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 51)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 51)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 51)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 51)
Supplier bankruptcy 4% (2 from 51)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 51)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (17 from 51)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.