Small cities • 2016

Město Kojetín

IČO 00301370

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovní hala Kojetín
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
3
Ø4 in industry
„ Revitalizace Masarykova náměstí, Kojetín“
Stavební úpravy chodníků
4
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce teplovodního kanálu na sídlišti SEVER v Kojetíně
Stavební úpravy domů
3
Ø4 in industry
Separace a svoz bioodpadů ve městě Kojetín
Pracovní nákladní vozidla se zařízením pro manipulaci
4
Ø4 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka CAS 20 MAN 18.340 4x4
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ptáček - pozemní stavby s.r.o.
1 29,865,466
Sates Morava spol. s r.o.
1 29,840,000
Erding, a.s.
1 5,923,099
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 4,889,900
Kobit - Thz s.r.o.
1 3,897,772
Other suppliers 5 7,079,766

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Inovativni 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

48%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (4 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 40% (4 from 10)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 10)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (2 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 10)