Small cities • 2016

Město Frýdlant nad Ostravicí

IČO 00296651

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Stavební úpravy, přístavba a nástavba kulturního domu ve Frýdlantu nad Ostravicí“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
„ Stavební úpravy ZŠ T.G. Masaryka č.p.1260“
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Humanizace Domova pro seniory Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce střechy střediska sociálních služeb domova seniorů Frýdlant nad Ostravicí
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Oprava ulice Nádražní ve Frýdlantu nad Ostravicí
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Pozemní stavitelství Zlín a.s.
1 49,652,540
Cone - Stavitelství, a.s.
5 20,870,232
Probi Inženýring s.r.o.
1 18,981,738
Stav Moravia spol. s r. o.
1 11,076,455
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 9,410,813
Other suppliers 5 10,024,361

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

44%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (5 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 14% (2 from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 43% (6 from 14)