State-owned enterprises • 2015

Lesy hl.m. Prahy

IČO 45247650

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

7.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rámcová smlouva - přípravné a stavební práce
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi
5
Ø7 in industry
Pomocné práce ve Stromovce
Služby související s údržbou okrasných zahrad a parků
8
Ø6 in industry
Stavební úpravy a zateplení objektu Strážnice Hostivař
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
3
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka automobilů
Sklápěcí nákladní auta
2
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění nákladní automobilové dopravy
Pronájem nákladních automobilů s řidičem
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stava s r.o.
12 10,911,700
T-gena s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Pražské vodohospodářské stavby, s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Pas Natura s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Vjaz s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Other suppliers 44 84,503,180

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 141,075,232
Unregulated purchases 153,230,958
Total 294,306,191

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Telekomunikační služby
Not disclosed
828,420
Telekomunikační služby
Not disclosed
828,420

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 57%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 60)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (11 from 60)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 60)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 60)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 60)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 60)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 60)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 60)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

76%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.12 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 60)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (15 from 60)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.