State-owned enterprises • 2015

Lesy hl.m. Prahy

IČO 45247650

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

7.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rámcová smlouva - přípravné a stavební práce
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi
5
Ø7 in industry
Pomocné práce ve Stromovce
Služby související s údržbou okrasných zahrad a parků
8
Ø6 in industry
Stavební úpravy a zateplení objektu Strážnice Hostivař
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
3
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka automobilů
Sklápěcí nákladní auta
2
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění nákladní automobilové dopravy
Pronájem nákladních automobilů s řidičem
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stava s r.o.
12 10,911,700
T-gena s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Pražské vodohospodářské stavby, s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Pas Natura s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Vjaz s.r.o.
1 10,149,621
Other suppliers 44 84,503,180

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 141,075,232
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 153,230,958
Total 294,306,191

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Telekomunikační služby
Not disclosed
- 828,420
Telekomunikační služby
Not disclosed
- 828,420

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 57%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 60)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (11 from 60)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 60)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 60)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 60)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 60)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 60)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 60)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 60)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

76%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.12 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 60)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (15 from 60)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.