Government • 2015

Fond dalšího vzdělávání

IČO 00405698

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sodexo Pass Česká republika a.s.
2 21,975,380
Pmvia s.r.o.
3 15,129,969
Bdo Advisory s.r.o.
4 14,867,539
Metodica, institut pro další vzdělávání
2 12,672,314
Hope Group s.r.o.
2 10,421,365
Other suppliers 39 45,612,593

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (2 from 17)
Nonprice competition 82% (14 from 17)
Lots 71% (12 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)
Inovativni 0% ( from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

38%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 120,679,162
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 698,646,222
Total 819,325,384

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
„Zajištění služeb public affairs v projektu Vzdělávání zaměstnanců se zdravotním postižením“
Not disclosed
- 1,510,000
"Dodávky kancelářských potřeb II.“
Not disclosed
- 1,037,437
Rámcová smlouva na nákup propagačních předmětů
Not disclosed
- 884,306
"Dotazníkové šetření na téma zjištění úrovně finanční gramotnosti"
Not disclosed
- 694,000
"Zajištění vozového parku FDV"
Not disclosed
- 680,362

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

31%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 23%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

54%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 52)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (6 from 52)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 52)
Missing supplier ID 12% (6 from 52)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 52)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 52)
Missing call for tenders 12% (6 from 52)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 52)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 52)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

12%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 19% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.46 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

70%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 52)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (5 from 52)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 48% (25 from 52)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.