Small cities • 2016

Město Horní Benešov

IČO 00296007

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Víceúčelové hřiště Horní Benešov“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Město Horní Benešov – vnitřní úpravy sportovní haly
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení objektu MŠ ve městě Horní Benešov
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
„Vnitřní úpravy sportovní haly“
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
„Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy internátu v Horním Benešově“
Stavební úpravy domů
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ekkl a.s.
1 16,321,756
Fichna - Hudeczek a.s.
1 6,856,765
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
1 6,096,386
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
1 3,945,675
Rýmstav Cz spol. s r.o.
1 3,807,052
Other suppliers 3 8,455,758

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

70%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Vnitřní úpravy sportovní haly“
Not disclosed
3,945,675

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 38% (3 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)