State-owned enterprises • 2015

Pražská vodohospodářská společnost a.s.

IČO 25656112

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Odstranění povodňových škod - Prosecké sběrače, Praha 9
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
2
Ø5 in industry
ÚV Želivka, rekonstrukce čerpací stanice surové vody
Systém pro řízení vodního hospodářství
3
Ø3 in industry
PČOV Miškovice - modernizace, č. akce 1359700
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
9
Ø5 in industry
ÚČOV - zvýšení kapacity odvodnění kalu a hygienizace
Výstavba zařízení na odvodňování kalů
3
Ø4 in industry
Odstranění povodňových škod - Pankrácka štola, Praha 4
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Čermák a Hrachovec a.s.
7 346,405,468
Pragis a.s.
7 314,505,082
Smp Cz, a.s.
3 226,098,537
Metrostav a.s.
6 195,943,067
Ohl Žs, a.s.
2 188,982,036
Other suppliers 76 956,467,065

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

70%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (13 from 0)
Nonprice competition 81% (35 from 43)
Division into lots 23% (10 from 43)
E-auction 0% (0 from 43)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 43)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,331,899,957
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 7,557,199,043
Total 9,889,099,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

18%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Odstranění povodňových škod - Prosecké sběrače, Praha 9
Krajní naléhavost
- 228,875,105
Odstranění povodňových škod - Pankrácka štola, Praha 4
Krajní naléhavost
- 111,941,260
Odstranění povodňových škod - Holešovický sběrač, Praha 7
Krajní naléhavost
- 110,704,515
Odstranění povodňových škod - Kanalizace ul. U Vojtěšky, Praha 6
Krajní naléhavost
- 77,333,602
Odstranění povodňových škod - oblast ulice Papírenské, Praha 6
Krajní naléhavost
- 77,306,772

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 12%
Cancelled contracts 2%
Average requirements modifications count 0.76

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (1 from 102)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (8 from 102)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 102)
Missing supplier ID 1% (1 from 102)
Missing buyer ID 3% (3 from 102)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 102)
Missing call for tenders 7% (7 from 102)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 102)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 102)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

32%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 52% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.55 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 102)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 102)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 102)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 102)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 102)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (6 from 102)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (13 from 102)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.