Hospitals • 2015

Zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Ostravě

IČO 71009396

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

5.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Doplnění a inovace systémů sledování a hodnocení imisní zátěže na území ČR na zdraví obyvatel I
Laboratorní, optické a přesné přístroje a zařízení (mimo skel)
2
Ø2 in industry
Analytický a mapový modul pro identifikaci podílů zdrojů na imisní situaci
Laboratorní služby
3
Ø4 in industry
Realizace úspor energie – Zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Ostravě
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka plynů a pronájem tlakových lahví
Plyny
2
Ø2 in industry
Očkovací látky
Očkovací látky
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Envitech Bohemia s.r.o.
1 31,691,981
E-expert, spol. s r.o.
1 19,935,779
Therm, spol. s r. o.
1 18,786,881
Dynex Laboratories, s.r.o.
2 13,163,800
Siad Czech spol. s r.o.
1 12,746,610
Other suppliers 43 71,682,531

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 168,055,585
Unregulated purchases 596,612,915
Total 764,668,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Hmotnostní spektrometr MALDI-TOF
Not disclosed
6,900,000
Upgrade SW Predictor LimA
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
1,601,293
Upgrade SW CADNA
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
618,869
Specializovaný software - typu MATLAB
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
407,384
Modernizace HW a upgrade vnitřního SW stávajících měřicích přístrojů
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
305,375

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 49)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 49)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 49)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 49)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 49)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 49)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 49)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 49)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.68 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 49)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 49)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (11 from 49)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.