State-owned enterprises • 2015

Správa Krkonošského národního parku Vrchlabí

IČO 00088455

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

32.
ranking
67%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Technické zázemí Správy KRNAP
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Tvorba lesních hospodářských plánů
Služby v oblasti lesnictví
2
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace klášterní zahrady
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
10
Ø5 in industry
Péče o zvěř v mimovegetačním období
Různé specializované stavební práce
8
Ø4 in industry
Snímkování a skenování území KRNAP a jeho ochranného pásma, včetně jejich následného zpracování
Letecké mapování
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Aquasys spol. s r.o.
23 54,039,049
Fischer Tpd s.r.o.
18 45,449,830
Kampa - Marynka s.r.o.
4 27,489,364
Macon a.s.
1 24,330,953
Lesprojekt Hradec Králové, s.r.o.
1 23,497,259
Other suppliers 154 171,644,039

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 7% (2 from 29)
Division into lots 90% (26 from 29)
E-auction 0% (0 from 29)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 29)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

82%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 410,862,894
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 199,680,477
Total 610,543,371

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 38%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 201)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 201)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 201)
Missing supplier ID 1% (3 from 201)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 201)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 201)
Missing call for tenders 18% (37 from 201)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 201)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 201)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.03 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 201)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 201)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 201)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 201)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 201)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 201)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (16 from 201)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 29%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.