Government • 2015

Národní Muzeum

IČO 00023272

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pan servis s.r.o.
6 69,909,053
Metrostav a.s.
2 59,798,823
Pracom s.r.o.
1 23,255,990
Luwex, akciová společnost (a.s.)
2 20,690,318
Česká pojišťovna a.s.
2 6,343,241
Other suppliers 14 33,453,863

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 216,400,006
Unregulated purchases 465,391,016
Total 681,791,022

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

14%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zajištění bezpečnostních služeb ve formě střežení
Krajní naléhavost
22,706,090
Zajištění služeb dozoru v expozicích a výstavách
Krajní naléhavost
14,021,461
Zajištění bezpečnostních služeb
Not disclosed
11,832,930
Zajištění bezpečnostních služeb
Not disclosed
11,630,190
Zajištění dozoru expozic
Not disclosed
7,690,735

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

42%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 21%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 1.61

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

51%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (7 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Call and award notices contradict each other 4% (1 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

22%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 28% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.86 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 28)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (3 from 28)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (2 from 28)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 56%

Non-disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.