State-owned enterprises • 2015

Správa Pražského Hradu

IČO 49366076

Good buyer. Court found serious misconduct. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

11.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Jízdárna Pohořelec - zkapacitnění skladů
Stavební úpravy skladů a průmyslových budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu pro Správu Pražského hradu pro období let 2013-2014
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu pro Správu Pražského hradu pro období let 2015-2016
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
Servis slaboproudých technologií areálu Pražského hradu
Opravy a údržba bezpečnostního zařízení
3
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce RS/TS 7700 a RS/TS 7800
Elektroinstalační práce
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vemex s.r.o.
2 63,669,040
Geosan Stavební a.s.
1 34,976,963
Techniserv, spol. s r.o.
1 29,359,975
Sp spol. s r.o.
2 27,930,443
Eltras, spol. s r.o.
1 24,193,758
Other suppliers 15 111,410,457

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 291,540,637
Unregulated purchases 1,002,958,909
Total 1,294,499,546

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávka elektřiny pro odběrná místa Správy Pražského hradu pro první čtvrtletí 2015
Krajní naléhavost
2,640,768
Servis digitální pobočkové automatické ústředny HiPath 4000
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
33,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.21

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (3 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Call and award notices contradict each other 5% (1 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 14% (3 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 73% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.05 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 22)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 32% (7 from 22)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.