Small cities • 2016

Město Zábřeh

IČO 00303640

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

71.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ROZVOJ A ZKVALITNĚNÍ VÝUKY NA ZÁKLADNÍ UMĚLECKÉ ŠKOLE ZÁBŘEH
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku města Zábřeh
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Oprava místních komunikací - Zábřeh
Práce na opravě silnic
1
Ø5 in industry
"Zateplení obvodových konstrukcí a výměna otvorových výplní ZŠ Severovýchod 484/26, Zábřeh"
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Zábřeh - oprava komunikací
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vhh Thermont s.r.o.
3 49,652,230
Ab Facility a.s.
1 17,346,999
Strabag a.s.
1 14,852,930
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 11,999,743
Amper Market, a.s.
1 11,375,452
Other suppliers 19 49,029,353

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (3 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 26)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

69%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 4% (1 from 26)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 26)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (3 from 26)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (2 from 26)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 42% (11 from 26)