Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Zábřeh

IČO 00303640

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

27%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EKO servis Zábřeh s.r.o.
2 25,548,115
Amper Market, a.s.
2 20,075,452
VW WACHAL a.s.
1 18,236,734
STRABAG a.s.
1 14,852,930
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 14,842,000
Other suppliers 10 21,079,706

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

41%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 17% (1 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 207,611,656
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 422,516,056
Total 630,127,713

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

55%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Provoz veřejného osvětlení ve městě Zábřeh
Technical exclusivity
- 12,071,061
Zábřeh - oprava komunikací, dodatečné práce č. 1
Additional works
- 2,842,257
Zateplení budovy MěÚ Zábřeh, nám. Osvobození 15 - dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Additional works
- 490,723
Dodatečné stavební práce akce Zateplení budovy MěÚ Zábřeh, nám. Osvobození 15
Additional works
- 252,814
Zateplení budovy MěÚ Zábřeh, nám. Osvobození 15 - dodatečné stavební práce č. 3
Additional works
- 227,743

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (4 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.76 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders