State-owned enterprises • 2015

Vojenský technický ústav, s.p.

IČO 24272523

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Ostraha odštěpných závodů ve VTÚ s.p.
Strážní služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka speciálního HW pro vojenská štábní vozidla
Součástí vojenských vozidel
3
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka speciálních zodolněných NTB pro vojenská vozidla
Součástí vojenských vozidel
2
Ø2 in industry
Finanční leasing osobních automobilů
Osobní vozidla
1
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka zařízení pro audiovizuální konferenční služby na specifickém komunikačním prostředí AČR
Součástí vojenských vozidel
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Rei s.r.o.
1 9,053,460
Akermann Electronic Praha, spol. s r.o.
2 6,842,180
C System Cz a.s.
1 4,916,862
Škoda Auto a.s.
1 3,361,614
Ttc Telekomunikace, s.r.o.
1 1,989,400
Other suppliers 5 6,720,991

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

18%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 32,884,508
Unregulated purchases 1,014,581,992
Total 1,047,466,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

44%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Finanční leasing osobních automobilů
Not disclosed
3,361,615
Integrace CIV/MIL - projekt
Not disclosed
1,795,369
Dodávka bateriových článků VARTA
Not disclosed
1,001,250

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

58%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (1 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 9% (1 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 36% (4 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 11)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.