Government • 2015

Hasičský záchranný sbor hlavního města Prahy

IČO 70886288

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Technické zhodnocení automobilových žebříků AZ30
Přebudování a generální opravy vozidel
2
Ø1 in industry
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky (CAS)
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
Nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky II.
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Fire & Safety Systems spol. s r.o.
6 23,495,127
Wiss Czech, s.r.o.
2 14,538,656
Luing Pyrex, spol. s r.o.
1 10,760,000
Strojírna Potůček s.r.o.
1 5,112,155
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 2,305,000
Other suppliers 1 1,898,730

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

76%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (1 from 7)
Nonprice competition 57% (4 from 7)
Lots 29% (2 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

35%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 59,679,101
Unregulated purchases 434,924,085
Total 494,603,186

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Nákup cisternových automobilových stříkaček
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
10,760,000
Oprava automobilového žebříku (AZ30)
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
2,166,667

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 33% (4 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.35 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 50% (6 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (4 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.