Hospitals • 2015

Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o.

IČO 00829838

Buyer profile has high number of errors. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

16.
ranking
68%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
,,Dodávka spirálního počítačového tomografu pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Tomografické přístroje
3
Ø2 in industry
,, Dodávka zemního plynu pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
,,Přístavba Onkologie včetně demolice objektu na stpč. 1382"
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
5
Ø5 in industry
,,Dodávka elektrické energie pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Elektrická energie
3
Ø4 in industry
„Zajištění komplexních úklidových služeb Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o.“
Úklidové služby
6
Ø8 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
2 36,500,000
Lama energy a.s.
1 19,422,500
Euromont Group a.s.
1 17,989,084
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
1 12,000,000
Putzteufel.cz, s.r.o., úklidový servis
1 6,432,707
Other suppliers 4 13,993,744

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

34%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 106,338,036
Unregulated purchases 836,432,964
Total 942,771,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 78%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 30% (3 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

18%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.34 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.