Hospitals • 2015

Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o.

IČO 00829838

Buyer profile has high number of errors. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 57%
Largest contracts
,,Dodávka spirálního počítačového tomografu pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Tomografické přístroje
Ø2 in industry
,, Dodávka zemního plynu pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Zemní plyn
Ø3 in industry
,,Přístavba Onkologie včetně demolice objektu na stpč. 1382"
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
Ø5 in industry
,,Dodávka elektrické energie pro Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o."
Elektrická energie
Ø4 in industry
„Zajištění komplexních úklidových služeb Nemocnice Jablonec nad Nisou, p.o.“
Úklidové služby
Ø8 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
2 36,500,000
Lama energy a.s.
1 19,422,500
Euromont Group a.s.
1 17,989,084
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
1 12,000,000, s.r.o., úklidový servis
1 6,432,707
Other suppliers 4 13,993,744

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 82%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 106,338,036
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 836,432,964
Total 942,771,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 78%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.34 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 33%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.