Government • 2015

Ministerstvo kultury

IČO 00023671

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

36.
ranking
66%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Pragoplyn, a.s.
5 128,040,412
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s.
1 111,000,000
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 95,000,000
Pražská energetika, a.s.
2 81,518,092
Amper Market, a.s.
1 79,165,460
Other suppliers 10 87,555,215

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 582,279,179
Unregulated purchases 1,554,683,624
Total 2,136,962,804

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

46%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 35%
Average requirements modifications count 1.93

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 20% (4 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

13%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 15% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (1 from 20)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.