State-owned enterprises • 2015

Zoologická zahrada hl. m. Prahy

IČO 00064459

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Naučná stezka kolem nové expozice slonů v Zoo Praha
Výstavba tematických parků
3
Ø4 in industry
Restaurace Afrika v Zoo Praha
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Zajištění sdružených služeb dodávky elektrické energie
Elektrická energie
6
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace skalního masivu – svah nad expozicí vzácných papoušků (Opěrná zeď a Vinice)
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Pavilon velemloků v Zoo Praha
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
8 52,710,346
Sps engineering, s.r.o.
2 20,433,526
Centropol Energy, a.s.
2 14,768,493
Korlea Invest, a.s., organizační složka
1 14,418,664
Konstruktiva Branko, a.s. v likvidaci
1 10,098,506
Other suppliers 43 46,954,810

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 50% (1 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 201,384,348
Unregulated purchases 282,510,010
Total 483,894,358

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

36%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

8%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 48%
Average requirements modifications count 1.44

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

48%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (2 from 57)
Final or estimated price not published 70% (40 from 57)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 57)
Missing supplier ID 11% (6 from 57)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 57)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 57)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 57)
Missing call for tenders 18% (10 from 57)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 39% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.37 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 57)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 57)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 57)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 57)
Supplier bankruptcy 2% (1 from 57)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (6 from 57)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (3 from 57)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.