Small cities • 2016

Město Chlumec nad Cidlinou

IČO 00268861

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

45.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

92%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kabiny Fotbalového klubu v Chlumci nad Cidlinou
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
6
Ø4 in industry
Oprava chodníků v Chlumci nad Cidlinou 2014
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací a chodníků v Chlumci nad Cidlinou
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Oprava komunikace, chodníků a víceúčelového hřiště v Chlumci nad Cidlinou 2015
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací a chodníků v Chlumci nad Cidlinou 2014
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Matex Hk s.r.o.
3 25,869,188
Strabag a.s.
2 11,973,239
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 4,570,000
M - Silnice a.s.
1 3,429,557
Meva-tec s.r.o.
1 1,620,000
Other suppliers 1 1,399,750

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Sběrný dvůr „Podkatovna“ Chlumec nad Cidlinou – stavba
Not disclosed
3,027,323
Kompostéry pro občany města Chlumec nad Cidlinou
Not disclosed
1,620,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 11% (1 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (3 from 9)