Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Chlumec nad Cidlinou

IČO 00268861

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

7.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz a nakládání s odpadem města Chlumce nad Cidlinou
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø2 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba objektu č. p. 61
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Mládežnická a oprava části ulice Na Vinici v Chlumci nad Cidlinou
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Velkokapacitní požární cisterna pro JSDH města Chlumec nad Cidlinou
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Oprava komunikace, chodníků a víceúčelového hřiště v Chlumci nad Cidlinou 2015
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 14,810,378
MATEX HK s.r.o.
1 14,749,866
STRABAG a.s.
2 13,332,878
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,105,000
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 4,385,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 96,614,721
Unregulated purchases 201,701,314
Total 298,316,035

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

92%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.33 (average mistakes per contract)