Small cities • 2016

Město Sedlec-prčice

IČO 00232645

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění energetických úspor ZŠ Sedlec-Prčice
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací ve městě Sedlec-Prčice
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Sběr, svoz a odstraňování směsného komunálního odpadu ze správního území města Sedlec-Prčice
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v osadách Sedlec-Prčice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro JPO II Sedlec
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
1 10,599,584
Porr a.s.
1 8,597,600
Compag Votice s.r.o.
1 7,652,970
B E S s.r.o.
1 5,849,636
Kobit - Thz s.r.o.
1 4,120,000
Other suppliers 1 3,062,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 50% (2 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

66%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 33% (2 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

67%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 17% (1 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (2 from 6)