State-owned enterprises • 2015

Vodovody a kanalizace Břeclav, a.s.

IČO 49455168

Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

22.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Úpravna vody Zaječí – intenzifikace a rekonstrukce
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
4
Ø4 in industry
BŘECLAV - ÚPRAVNA VODY KANČÍ OBORA
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
8
Ø4 in industry
Rakvice - ČOV
Výstavba čistíren odpadních vod
6
Ø4 in industry
BŘECLAV - ÚPRAVNA VODY KANČÍ OBORA - dodatečné stavební práce II
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
1
Ø4 in industry
ÚPRAVNA VODY ZAJEČÍ - intenzifikace a rekonstrukce - zpracování projektové dokumentace
Příprava návrhů a projektů, odhad nákladů
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Smp Cz, a.s.
4 338,420,670
Imos Brno, a.s.
1 334,895,067
Arko Technology, a.s.
1 84,698,936
Aqua Procon s.r.o.
2 19,256,000
Komerční banka, a.s.
1 9,340,020
Other suppliers 3 16,544,600

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

84%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 803,155,293
Unregulated purchases 326,551,207
Total 1,129,706,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

45%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 42% (5 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 38% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.94 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.