Hospitals • 2015

Nemocnice ve Frýdku-místku, příspěvková organizace

IČO 00534188

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komplexní prádelenský servis pro krajské nemocnice
Praní a čištění
2
Ø3 in industry
Komplexní úklidová služba pro krajské nemocnice
Úklidové služby
4
Ø8 in industry
Zateplení vybraných objektů Nemocnice ve Frýdku - Místku
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
24
Ø4 in industry
Praní prádla
Praní a čištění
2
Ø3 in industry
PCHO - technická infrastruktura Nemocnice ve Frýdku-Místku, p.o.
Stavby sloužící dopravě
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

30%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Renatex Cz a.s.
1 198,000,000
Simacek Hs, spol. s r.o.
1 43,368,100
Dec-plast Trade s.r.o.
1 20,860,980
Inpo, spol. s r.o.
2 6,000,012
Olympus Czech Group, s.r.o., člen koncernu
2 5,890,000
Other suppliers 10 31,023,666

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (2 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 305,142,761
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 597,674,239
Total 902,817,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 78%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 47% (8 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 71% (12 from 17)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 17)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 29% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.45 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

64%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (1 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 6% (1 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 41% (7 from 17)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%

Non-disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.