Small cities • 2016

Město Králův Dvůr

IČO 00509701

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění stravování žáků a zaměstnanců ZŠ a MŠ v Králově Dvoře od školního roku 2015/2016
Podávání jídel
2
Ø2 in industry
Králův Dvůr – Levín – splašková kanalizace, zhotovitel
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
7
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní víceúčelové centrum Králův Dvůr
Stavební úpravy v souvislosti s objekty pro sportovní hřiště
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace významné sídelní zeleně v intravilánu města Králův Dvůr
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø6 in industry
„VÝSTAVBA PAVILONU „E“ V MŠ POD HÁJEM“
Stavební montážní práce
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Školní jídelna Hořovice, s.r.o.
2 40,000,000
Petr Vykrut
3 19,954,784
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-cz s.r.o.
1 19,949,436
Vysspa Sports Technology s.r.o.
1 18,854,498
Trepart s.r.o.
2 16,506,423
Other suppliers 10 62,931,353

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (3 from 3)
Division into lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

61%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 11% (2 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 26% (5 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 19)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 19)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (1 from 19)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (4 from 19)