Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Králův Dvůr

IČO 00509701

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 91,979,331
Školní jídelna Hořovice, s.r.o.
2 40,000,000
Technické služby Beroun, s.r.o.
2 24,248,000
STAVBY DLOUHÝ s.r.o.
1 8,980,044
Konstruktis Alfa spol. s r.o.
1 6,768,884
Other suppliers 5 21,495,703

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Division into lots 40% (2 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 308,142,421
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 337,202,421
Total 645,344,842

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 40%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (2 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 45% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.82 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders