Hospitals • 2015

Nemocnice Jindřichův Hradec, a.s.

IČO 26095157

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

83%
average 57%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

20%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
2 166,780,351
Sska-stavební společnost Karviná, a.s.
2 23,390,014
Arstav s.r.o.
2 23,342,480
Pradast, spol. s r.o.
1 6,891,470
L I N E T spol. s r.o.
1 4,048,400
Other suppliers 2 3,423,963

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 227,876,679
Unregulated purchases 836,892,321
Total 1,064,769,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Modernizace a dostavba nemocnice Jindřichův Hradec
Dodatečné práce
13,412,351
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov poliklinik Nemocnice Jindřichův Hradec
Not disclosed
3,873,233
Stavební úpravy pavilonu C v areálu nemocnice Jindřichův Hradec
Dodatečné práce
3,476,263

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

24%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 30% (3 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 30% (3 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

26%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 36% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.11 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (2 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (1 from 10)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%

Non-disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.