Government • 2015

Národní památkový ústav

IČO 75032333

Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

36.
ranking
66%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kuks – Granátové jablko; Hospital – realizace obnovy
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
8
Ø4 in industry
Zhotovitel staveb v areálu Centra obnovy památek architektury 20. století
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
3
Ø4 in industry
Výběr generálního dodavatele stavby - NCDT Valtice
Rekonstrukce budov
12
Ø5 in industry
Realizace rekonstrukcí objektů v areálu SZ Veltrusy
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce nové správní budovy NPÚ Ostrava
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
7
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hochtief Cz a. s.
2 315,038,938
Vw Wachal a.s.
1 177,907,587
Unistav a.s.
4 151,177,458
Psj, a.s.
1 107,185,000
Konsit a.s.
1 92,374,677
Other suppliers 90 498,653,361

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 41% (16 from 39)
Nonprice competition 8% (3 from 39)
Lots 21% (8 from 39)
E-auction 0% (0 from 39)
Inovativni 0% ( from 39)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

76%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,342,572,028
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 969,247,455
Total 2,311,819,483

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 18%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.98

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (5 from 99)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (15 from 99)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 99)
Missing supplier ID 4% (4 from 99)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 99)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 99)
Missing call for tenders 21% (21 from 99)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 99)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 99)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

16%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (2 from 99)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 99)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (19 from 99)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.