Hospitals • 2015

Krajská nemocnice Liberec, a.s.

IČO 27283933

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komplexní pojištění KNL, a.s.
Pojištění
3
Ø2 in industry
Krajská nemocnice Liberec - HELIPORT
Stavba ocelových konstrukcí
8
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka počítačového tomografu
Tomografické přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Mobilní CT
Tomografické přístroje
1
Ø2 in industry
Poskytování servisních služeb - lineární urychlovače
Opravy a údržba zdravotnických přístrojů
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
North Med spol. s r.o.
7 52,435,190
Philips Česká republika s.r.o.
7 51,665,055
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
2 51,595,198
Siemens, s.r.o.
3 42,431,029
Cl-evans s.r.o.
3 34,535,094
Other suppliers 41 215,038,779

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (9 from 18)
Nonprice competition 22% (4 from 18)
Lots 33% (6 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Inovativni 0% ( from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

32%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 448,832,515
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 4,004,523,485
Total 4,453,356,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

47%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Upgrade angiografického přístroje Allura 9C
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 17,063,425
Poskytování servisních služeb - MR Achieva 1,5T
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 9,964,800
Komplexní pojištění KNL, a.s.
Krajní naléhavost
- 9,700,378
Poskytování servisních služeb - Brilliance CT 16-slice
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 6,538,920
Poskytování servisních služeb - rentgenové přístroje
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 6,330,840

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

35%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 26%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.57

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (2 from 63)
Final or estimated price not published 13% (8 from 63)
Procedure type not published 2% (1 from 63)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 63)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 63)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 63)
Missing call for tenders 14% (9 from 63)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 63)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 63)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 44% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.35 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 63)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 63)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 63)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 63)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 63)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 63)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (17 from 63)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 33%

Partial disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.