Small cities • 2016

Město Beroun

IČO 00233129

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování služeb a správy majetku města Beroun
Správa zařízení (institucí)
4
Ø3 in industry
Veřejná doprava pro všechny
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování služeb a správy majetku města Beroun
Správa zařízení (institucí)
1
Ø3 in industry
II. ZŠ Preislerova- zateplení
Tepelné izolace
8
Ø6 in industry
Sejdeme se na Plzeňce
Opravy a modernizace budov
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Technické služby Beroun,s.r.o.
2 91,956,592
Strabag a.s.
2 41,084,937
Marhold a.s.
1 19,616,069
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
1 17,480,533
Berger Bohemia a. s.
1 13,957,209
Other suppliers 16 56,872,457

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (5 from 0)
Nonprice competition 29% (2 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

53%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Poskytování služeb a správy majetku města Beroun
Not disclosed
- 31,636,382
Oprava chodníku, propustku a opěrné zdi v Berouně – městské části Jarov
Not disclosed
- 3,301,130

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (2 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 17% (4 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 23)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 23)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (1 from 23)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (7 from 23)