Small cities • 2016

Město Zruč nad Sázavou

IČO 00236667

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

7%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zručský zámek ožívá - III. etapa
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
1
Ø4 in industry
Zručský zámek ožívá - III. etapa
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
2
Ø4 in industry
Administrativně-správní objekt TS ve Zruči nad Sázavou II
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Obnova veřejné zeleně ve Zruči nad Sázavou
Zahradnické služby
4
Ø6 in industry
Dodávka zametacího vozidla a techniky pro svoz bioodpadu - Město Zruč nad Sázavou
Zametací vozy
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

11%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Archatt Památky spol. s r.o.
2 85,559,845
Stavmika s.r.o.
1 6,885,999
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 6,150,636
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 2,737,000
Vanderlaan s.r.o.
1 2,558,525
Other suppliers 1 1,850,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

13%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zručský zámek ožívá - III. etapa
Dodatečné práce
42,780,646

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

60%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 29% (2 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)