State-owned enterprises • 2015

Čez Distribuce, a. s.

IČO 24729035

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

0%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba nové TR 110/22 kV Chýně
Instalace a montáž rozvoden
5
Ø4 in industry
TR Tuchlovice - zvýšení zkratové odolnosti
Výstavba rozvoden
4
Ø3 in industry
Výstavba nové TR 110/22 kV Holýšov
Instalace a montáž rozvoden
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce vedení vvn Třebovice - odb. Studénka
Nadzemní elektrická vedení
5
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění BOZP při přípravě a realizaci staveb dle zákona 309/2006 Sb. a věcí souvisejících
Služby v oblasti bezpečnosti a zdraví
2
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

0%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 45)
Nonprice competition 20% (9 from 45)
Lots 64% (29 from 45)
E-auction 0% (0 from 45)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

0%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 0
Unregulated purchases 141,324,497,500
Total 141,324,497,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

0%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

19%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 67%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.27

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

0%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 100% (27 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.07 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

0%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 27)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 22% (6 from 27)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (4 from 27)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.