State-owned enterprises • 2015

Ústav organické chemie a biochemie Av Čr, v. v. i.

IČO 61388963

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

23%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Cgm Czech a.s.
2 1,738,288,732
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
4 167,410,178
Scientific Instruments Brno, spol. s.r.o.
4 108,587,500
WALDNER Laboreinrichtungen GmbH & Co.KG
0 101,239,333
Hrubymoving s.r.o.
1 75,108,400
Other suppliers 29 236,497,463

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,427,131,610
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 2,427,131,610

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

50%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 0.18

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

27%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 44)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (2 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 44)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 27% (12 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.40 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 7% (3 from 44)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier bankruptcy 2% (1 from 44)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (6 from 44)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.