Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Královéhradeckého kraje

IČO 75151545

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Průmstav Náchod s.r.o.
2 9,211,059
Ag Com, a.s.
1 6,462,201
Iss Facility Services s.r.o.
9 3,748,765
Asj s.r.o.
2 3,631,454
Life Technologies Czech Republic s.r.o.
3 3,242,917
Other suppliers 9 10,301,672

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

25%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 36,598,073
Unregulated purchases 553,879,925
Total 590,477,998

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

57%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

54%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (1 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 26)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

23%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 30% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 26)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 4% (1 from 26)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.