Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje

IČO 75151537

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ŠPS KŘP Ústeckého kraje - zprovoznění objektu
Práce při dokončování budov
6
Ø5 in industry
Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, Ústí nad Labem, Horova č.p. 13 – dislokace OHS -rekonstrukce objektu
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými službami
18
Ø14 in industry
"ZAJIŠTĚNÍ STAVEBNÍ PŘIPRAVENOSTI PROJEKTU INTEGROVANÉHO OPERAČNÍHO STŘEDISKA - KRAJSKÉHO ŘEDITELSTVÍ POLICIE ÚSTECKÉHO KRAJE, CZ.1.06/3.4.00/11.07569"
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými službami
5
Ø14 in industry
Poskytování služeb elektronických komunikací
Datové služby
neuveden
Ø1 in industry
"Kontaktní a koordinační centra II. - Krajské ředitelství policie Severočeského kraje CZ.1.06/3.4.00/05/06276 - Ústí nad Labem, Všebořická 244/11"
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými službami
19
Ø14 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sim stavby spol. s r.o.
4 17,279,822
Naturtep spol. s r.o.
4 15,395,283
Ulimex, spol. s r.o.
1 10,891,177
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
1 6,481,836
Metall Quatro spol. s r.o.
3 5,211,686
Other suppliers 20 27,161,257

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

30%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 82,535,185
Unregulated purchases 849,439,668
Total 931,974,853

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

72%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 9% (3 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

7%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 7% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.24 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 33)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (7 from 33)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.