Government • 2015

Státní zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Praze

IČO 75010330

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Thermo Fisher Scientific (praha) s.r.o.
1 11,279,124
Pragolab s.r.o.
3 10,366,800
Zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Ostravě
1 9,700,000
Czech Coal a.s.
1 8,173,440
Hpst, s.r.o.
3 6,891,218
Other suppliers 42 42,055,145

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 102,799,025
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 276,264,045
Total 379,063,070

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka kompletního řešení pro rychlé identifikace mikroorganizmů z klinických izolátů a hemokultur na bázi stolního hmotnostního spektrometru MALDI-TOF
Not disclosed
- 4,800,000
Dodávka genetického analyzátoru a sekvenátoru
Not disclosed
- 2,890,797
Dodávka BioNumerics software
Not disclosed
- 1,263,503

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 0.44

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

66%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (3 from 52)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (2 from 52)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 52)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 52)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 52)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 52)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 52)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 52)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 52)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 24% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 52)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (16 from 52)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.