Government • 2015

Krajská hygienická stanice Královéhradeckého kraje se sídlem v Hradci Králové

IČO 71009213

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

45.
ranking
64%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
khskk - pc
Stolní počítač
2
Ø3 in industry
khskk - stolní pc
Stolní počítač
2
Ø3 in industry
khskk - pc2
Stolní počítač
3
Ø3 in industry
khskk - tiskárny a kopírky 2014
Laserové tiskárny
2
Ø3 in industry
khskk - ultrabooky
Přenosné počítače
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Autocont Cz a.s.
8 697,115
Gc System a.s.
5 553,520
C System Cz a.s.
1 49,120

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 0)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

18%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,299,756
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 38,312,743
Total 39,612,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 100% (14 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (3 from 14)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.