Hospitals • 2015

Krajská zdravotní, a.s.

IČO 25488627

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

12%
average 57%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

13%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ecp a.s.
1 2,826,360,000
Metall Quatro spol. s r.o.
1 129,495,914
Čez Teplárenská, a.s.
1 60,000,000
Stapro s. r. o.
2 56,439,850
Amedis, spol. s r.o.
2 42,410,120
Other suppliers 92 421,772,879

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (25 from 0)
Nonprice competition 14% (5 from 37)
Division into lots 86% (32 from 37)
E-auction 0% (0 from 37)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 37)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 3,638,358,777
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 4,305,097,723
Total 7,943,456,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 78%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

34%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 44%
Average requirements modifications count 1.73

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (5 from 100)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (9 from 100)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 100)
Missing supplier ID 4% (4 from 100)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 100)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 100)
Missing call for tenders 7% (7 from 100)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 100)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 100)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 58% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.32 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

63%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 100)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 100)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 100)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 100)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 100)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 100)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (19 from 100)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 33%

Partial disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.