Small cities • 2016

Město Lipník nad Bečvou

IČO 00301493

Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Lipník nad Bečvou - rekonstrukce ulic Losertova a Palackého
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
2
Ø6 in industry
Lipník nad Bečvou - revitalizace ulice Bratrská
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
10
Ø5 in industry
Sběrné středisko odpadů Lipník nad Bečvou
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Obnova zámeckého parku
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
5
Ø6 in industry
Sběrný dvůr odpadů Lipník nad Bečvou – technologické vybavení
Systém kontejnerového skladování
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sates Morava spol. s r.o.
1 16,363,000
Strabag a.s.
1 9,479,087
Ares Lipník n. B., s.r.o.
4 8,751,001
Šum & Kon, Lipník nad Bečvou, s.r.o.
1 5,854,759
Elkoplast Cz, s.r.o.
1 2,420,344
Other suppliers 1 1,816,574

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 40%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

63%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 56% (5 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)